|
| |
Texas Cattle Fever Tick Quarantine and Outbreak Area
Objective:
To assist agricultural livestock producers in Texas Fever Tick quarantine and
Blanket areas defined by Texas Animal Health Commission in installing
conservation practices. Conservation practices within these areas will improve
livestock herd management by facilitating livestock movements for animal health
reasons in an effort to reduce the threat of “Texas Fever” or Bovine babesiosis.
Resource Concern:
Domestic Animals – Stress and Mortality – Animals described as exhibiting
illness or death from disease, parasites, insects, poisonous plants, or other
factors. Land, water use and management are consistent with activities conducted
to alleviate stress and mortality factors in cattle.
Screening Priorities – Physical Location of Land
- Systematic or expanded Quarantine zones as defined by TAHC with RMS or
Progressive Conservation Plan - High Priority
- One of the 17 counties designated, but NOT in systematic or expanded
quarantine with RMS or Progressive Conservation Plan - Medium Priority
- One of the 17 counties designated, but NOT in systematic or expanded
quarantine without a SWCD approved Conservation Plan - Low Priority
Only High and Medium Priority Categories will be ranked unless funds remain
after screening.
Eligible Practices:
Brush Management (314)
Fence (382)
Nutrient Management (590)
Pasture and Hay Planting (512)
Pest Management (595)
Pipeline (516)
Pond (378)
Prescribed Burning (338)
Prescribed Grazing (528)
Range Planting (550)
Upland Wildlife Habitat Management (645)
Water Well (642)
Watering Facility (614)
All practices will be installed according to the applicable standards and
specifications in the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Field Office
Technical Guide (FOTG).
Payment Rates
Practices will be paid based on the established payment rate of the practice.
Ranking Criteria
National Priorities Addressed (Scoring Multiplier = 1.50)
| Issue Questions |
Responses
|
1. Will the treatment you intend to implement using EQIP result in a
considerable reduction of non-point source pollution, such as nutrients,
sediment, pesticides, excess salinity in impaired watersheds with total maximum
daily loads (TMDLs) where available, groundwater contamination or point sources
such as contamination from confined animal feeding operations? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
2. Will the treatment you intend to implement for water conservation or
irrigation efficiency using EQIP result in a considerable reduction in water
use? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
3. Will the treatment you intend to implement using EQIP result in a
considerable reduction of emissions, such as particulate matter, nitrogen oxides
(NOx), volatile organic compounds, and ozone precursors and depleters that
contribute to air quality impairment violations of National Ambient Air Quality
Standards? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
4. Will the treatment you intend to implement using EQIP result in a
considerable reduction in soil erosion and sedimentation from unacceptable
levels on agricultural land? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
5. Will the treatment you intend to implement using EQIP result in a
considerable increase in the promotion of at-risk species habitat conservation?
|
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
6. Will the treatment that you intend to implement using EQIP result in
considerable benefits to residue management, nutrient management, air quality
management, invasive species management, pollinator habitat, and animal carcass
management technology or pest management? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
7. Will the treatment that you intend to implement using EQIP result in energy
conservation benefits? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
State Issues Addressed (Scoring Multiplier = 1.50)
| Issue Questions |
Responses
|
| 1. Is land in which you are applying for EQIP located in the systematic or
expanded quarantine area as defined by the Texas Animal Health Commission? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
| 2. Is land in which you are applying for EQIP located in the designated 17
county area that is identified in the Domestic Animal Health Resource Concern
area? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
| 3. Will a Prescribed Grazing System Plan be utilized as part of the proposed
fever tick eradication system? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
| 4. Will a regular schedule of prescribed burning (one out of three years) be
utilized to ensure long term success of tick eradication? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
| 5. Will brush management be conducted in a manner consistent with enhancing
forage production for increasing fuel load (for prescribed fire) and grazing
management purposes?
|
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
| 6. Do you have an Approved Wildlife Habitat Plan on the property? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
Local Issues Addressed (Scoring Multiplier = 1.00)
| Issue Questions |
Responses
|
| 1. For this participant, has an NRCS contract been terminated because of
violation in the past 3 years? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
| 2. Has this participant cancelled an NRCS contract within the past 3 years where
cost recovery was assessed? |
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
3. Has this participant cancelled an NRCS contract within the past 3 years where
cost recovery was waived?
|
Yes 0 or
No 0 |
| |
|