|
| |
EQIP Program in Palo Pinto County
The Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)
offers cost share assistance to agricultural producers to implement
on-farm conservation practices. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) determines eligible producers for the EQIP program and
determines eligible land. Eligible producers may apply for cost share
assistance on conservation practices that will address the identified
resource concern identified by the Local Work Group (LWG).
Interested agricultural producers may apply in person at the
Palo Pinto County USDA Service Center. Applicants may also request
EQIP
assistance by telephone, fax, e-mail, or letter.
State Resource Concerns Priority Areas that include part of
Palo Pinto County:
Objective:
The objective of the Palo Pinto County EQIP Local Work Group is to promote
the use of conservation practices for improving the natural resources throughout
the county. An emphasis will be placed on conservation practices to promote
grassland improvement, grazing distribution, and increase the quality and
quantity of desirable vegetation.
County EQIP Resource Concern:
In Palo Pinto County for 2007, the Local Work Group has identified Plant
Health as the major resource concern. Invasive brush, primarily mesquite and
juniper is a major concern in the county. In addition, deteriorating range and
pasture conditions have resulted in declining forage quality and quantity.
Practices have been selected to address these resource concerns. Controlling
brush will also affect water quantity, which has become a recent concern.
Priority for Funding:
High Priority Applications- applicant requests eligible practice(s), meets
all USDA eligibility criteria, and has applied for USDA cost-share.
All other applications will be considered medium or low priority and will not be
ranked.
Eligible Practices and Cost Share Rates:
Limited Resource Producers - 90 percent
Beginning Farmers or Ranchers - 50 percent
Others - 50 percent
Practices will be cost shared based on the established average cost of the
practice. The amount of cost share earned will be the number of units certified
after completion multiplied by the average cost multiplied by the cost share
percentage. Prescribed grazing incentive will be based on 100% flat rate
Cost sharing will be allowed for the following high-priority practices as
identified in the Field Office Technical Guide -
Brush Management 314 Mechanical grub/treedoze mixed brush, aerial spraying or
individual plant treatment. Mechanical brush management includes grubbing
resprouting species such as mesquite, dozing, root plowing, stacking and piling.
The target species for mechanical brush management will be mesquite and juniper.
Individual plant treatment can be applied where brush densities exceed 10% crown
canopy and are in excess of 50 plants per acre – primarily mesquite. Densities
must be less than 400 plants per acre to make IPT economically feasible. An
onsite observation will determine whether or not an area is eligible. Aerial
spraying will be primarily for mesquite, prickly pear or other invasive brush
species. Pastures will be deferred a minimum of 90 days during the growing
season, following brush management. No cost share for brush management will be
approved on cropland or on land to be converted to cropland.
Fencing 382 Four-wire barbed wire or electric fencing will be constructed
according to NRCS specifications. The purpose of this practice is to allow
better grazing distribution and rotation to allow pastures a rest during the
growing season. Boundary fences will not be cost-shared.
Pasture Planting 512 Includes seedbed preparation, sprigs or seed cost,
sprigging operation or seeding operation. Nutrient Management and Pest
Management will be planned with this practice.
Range Planting 550 Includes seedbed preparation, seed cost and seeding
operation.
Nutrient Management 590 For establishment only
Pest Management 595 For establishment only
Pipeline 516 For livestock water use only
Prescribed Grazing Incentive 528 Will be planned on pastures as determined to be
needed by NRCS personnel. 100 percent FR per acre. This practice will also apply
to pastures affected by wildfires.
Ranking Criteria:
Resource Concerns – Plant Health, Water Quantity
100 points – Is brush management planned to address the needs of both plant
health and water quantity?
90 points – Has the applicant suffered a loss of grazing land and/or cross
fencing from wildfire in 2006?
30 points – Is range planting and pasture planting planned to increase the
quality and quantity of forage?
20 points – Are practices such fencing and/or livestock pipeline planned to
increase grazing distribution?
10 points - As of October 1, 2006, did you have an updated (within the last
three years) conservation plan on file with NRCS that has all information
necessary to rank the application?
Practices are supported by the Conservation Practice Standards in the Field
Office Technical Guide that are needed to solve the identified resource problem
as set forth by the Palo Pinto County Local Work Group. Practices cost shared
must meet identified criteria in the conservation practice standard. Only the
practices listed will be eligible for cost-share. Applications will be ranked
using the national ranking tool and points will be awarded according to how the
application addresses National,State,and Local issues along with cost efficiency
of the practices needed to solve the resource concerns.
The following criteria will be used for all applications. Applications with no
eligible practices will not receive a ranking score. High priority applications
will be funded based on highest total offer index score. Applications with lower
offer index scores are funded as funds are available. The application with the
highest tracking number, randomly assigned by Protracts, will be funded first in
the case of ties.
| |
|