|
| |
NRCS works alongside ranchers in fever tick fight
By Beverly Moseley, Public Affairs Specialist, Zone 4
There’s a battle being fought in South Texas. On one side is the cattle fever
tick. On the frontline of the offensive fight are local, state and national
agencies, associations and landowners working to eradicate the costly pest.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) is one agency working in
partnership with these individuals and groups in a statewide fever tick
initiative.
“Our involvement in the fever tick initiative or eradication is just one piece
of the integrated approach to eradication or control,” said Don Gohmert, Texas’
state conservationist for the Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Gohmert spoke recently at a fever tick summit held at Texas A&M University in
College Station. Industry experts, officials and agencies gathered to discuss
ongoing efforts to control and eradicate the fever tick.
He explained that NRCS’ involvement is non-regulatory. Its partnership efforts
focus on helping landowners with technical assistance, conservation planning and
financial assistance programs in the fever tick zone areas of South Texas.
“While we’re not about trying to remove ticks on cattle or deer, we’re trying to
create a habitat out there that can be managed better and with less stress and
at the same time might control the tick population in some of these pastures
that have been quarantined,” Gohmert said.
Fever Ticks
The cattle fever tick was eradicated from the United States in 1943. Despite
decades of efforts by federal agencies to control its reintroduction into Texas,
the tick is once again thriving in some South Texas counties.
The Texas-Mexico border can be as porous as the waters of the Rio Grande River
that separates the two countries. Fever ticks have been found riding the hides
of cattle, wildlife and horses that have crossed into Texas.
Two ticks are being fought – Boophilus annulatus and Boophilus microplus. Both
are capable of carrying the protozoa that can transmit the disease Babesia or
tick fever, which kills cattle.
“Imported Mexican cattle are one of the biggest challenges,” said Dr. Bob
Hillman, executive director of the Texas Animal Health Commission. “Up to 50
percent of Mexican origin cattle are carriers of Babesia. … break the cycle by
eliminating the tick, that’s the whole purpose of this.”
Hillman noted that while the ticks are present in South Texas, the active
Babesia disease has not been identified in any Texas cattle since its
eradication.
The commission is the state’s animal health regulatory agency in charge of
implementing eradication and control methods. Other agencies involved in efforts
include the Agricultural Research Service, Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service and AgriLife Extension.
Surveillance and control measures continue in the 17 South Texas counties that
encompass the fever tick zone. More than one million acres and 661 premises are
under quarantine due to fever tick infestations or exposure. These counties
carry regulatory designations ranging from permanently quarantined to low risk.
Control and eradication measures and options include “scratching” cattle for
ticks, scheduled dipping programs of infested cattle in vats of an acaracide, or
vacating an infested premise.
Fever ticks are a “one-host” tick. The preferred hosts are cattle. The tick’s
entire life cycle will take place on this one animal. Tick larvae are about the
size of a pin head and have six legs. As cattle graze, the larvae positioned on
blades of grass, reach up and grab the animal’s hair coat. It then finds a spot
on the hide to feed.
“That period of time from when the larvae get on this animal, transition to a
nymph and transition to an adult and the female is about ready to fall off is
about 20 to 21 days,” said Pete Teel, professor of entomology at Texas A&M. “The
female falls off of the animal and searches for a place on the ground to lay its
eggs. It’s going to look for a suitable microclimate that it thinks is going to
be suitable for the incubation of the eggs.”
Cattle in a dipping program are run through a dipping vat every two weeks for
six months. Teel said dipping every fourteen days is key to killing adult ticks
before the females have a chance to drop off the host and lay eggs.
The fact that these ticks have been found on wildlife such as whitetail deer,
red deer and nilgai in the zone complicates eradication, control and movement
efforts. The density of exotic wildlife in the area has in turn increased the
survivability of larvae.
Larvae that previously would have perished due to the lack of a host are being
picked up by wildlife as they move through an infested area.
“The biggest most complex challenge is wildlife,” Hillman said.
Microclimate or microhabitats play another key role in a tick’s survivability.
“Population dynamics of cattle fever ticks are driven by weather and by the
diversity and density of hosts,” Teel said. “They are wet, dry season driven.”
Bare ground is the most inhospitable environment for a tick to survive.
Rangelands with grass are better, however canopies provide the best environment,
Teel said, adding that populations rebuild during wet seasons.
Economic impact assumptions
David Anderson, an ag economist with Texas AgriLife Extension, presented data on
an economic model that calculated the cost to eradicate the fever tick if it was
found outside of the tick zone in three different regions of Texas.
“This is all based on assumptions. We’ve had to make a lot of assumptions,”
Anderson said.
Some of the assumptions included:
There were three non-adjacent outbreaks in different regions of the state.
There was unlimited money, labor and time to eradicate the ticks.
It was assumed that ranchers had no option but to dip. The cost to present the
cattle for inspection and dipping were some of the costs factored in.
“We also assumed that 95 percent of the producers in affected regions would
choose to dip. That’s opposite of the way it normally is. Most people chose to
vacate the pastures,” Anderson said.
The infestations occurred in the spring and required dipping cattle every 14
days for six months.
It also was assumed that cattle did not have the disease Babesia that the tick
spreads.
“That’s where we’ve started, it’s to approach the ticks and not the disease,” he
said.
The economic model estimated it would cost an average of $271 a cow to eradicate
the tick from these three hypothetical regions, Anderson said.
Facing Challenges
Fighting the fever tick is costly. It would cost more than $14 million annually
to fully fund the tick program in Texas. This figure includes having available
all the necessary personnel, equipment and acaracide to fight the battle,
according to the Texas Animal Health Commission.
For ranchers, the costly fight adds more red ink to the bottom line of a
business that already is struggling with high input costs. NRCS is working
alongside these affected landowners to provide technical assistance, along with
conservation planning and financial assistance through the agency’s
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP).
“Our mission is primarily to help people help the land. In other words, help the
ranchers down there that are living with this situation. There is a burden upon
them to gather and present cattle for scratching and dipping, while still trying
to make a living in the quarantine zone. Those are the people we’re trying to
help through our programs,” Gohmert said.
It all begins with a conservation plan. NRCS field personnel sit down with a
rancher to help identify and meet management goals and objectives. Ranchers also
can be provided with a map of their operation which delineates features such as
fencing, roads, stock tanks and land features.
“This conservation plan is a systematic way for them to look at their resources
out there, how they want to operate, how they want to manage,” said Gohmert.
Conservation plans can include cross fencing, prescribed or rotational grazing,
brush management, prescribed burning, wildlife upland habitat management and
water developments, such as troughs, pipelines and water wells.
“What we want to do is provide this broad scale effort – the chemical, the
mechanical, the biological controls that have to be in place to address the tick
itself. And, of course, the on-the-land management that goes along with it has
got to be part of it,” Gohmert said.
Beyond conservation plans are financial assistance programs, such as EQIP, which
has funding available to the 17 fever tick zone counties. The program can pay
upwards of 60 percent of the input costs for management practices such as
building cross-fencing or digging out stock tanks.
Gohmert added that another $2.5 million to $3 million is budgeted through fiscal
year 2010 for the 17-county area.
Resource Conservation and Development (RC&D) is another assistance program
available through NRCS. There are four of these program offices operating in the
zone.
This community-based program has local people writing and developing grants to
assist with information and funding on items such as upgrading dipping vats,
expanding dry fire hydrants and helping acquire surface fire fighting equipment.
They work closely with the Texas Animal Health Commission on helping determine
where dipping vats should be located, if new vats are needed and who will manage
these dipping vats.
“It is a partnership effort among all of us. We’re all in this together. Texas
would not be the same state if we would happen to lose the livestock industry,”
Gohmert said.

|
 |
Dipping vats full of an acaracide and water mixture are used to kill
fever ticks on cattle. Dipping vats can be an effective eradication and
control method for fever ticks because the animal is completely
submerged in the mixture. |
South Texas cattle are inspected for ticks. Surveillance and control
measures continue in the 17 South Texas counties that encompass the
fever tick zone. |
 |
|
Fever ticks on
a cow’s hindquarters.
Photo courtesy of Texas Animal Health Commission.
|
|
| |
|